Quality of Life Amongst Saudi Physiotherapists: A Review of Burnout, Job Satisfaction and Work-Related Well-Being

Background. Physiotherapists are integral to the development of Saudi Arabia's healthcare system; however, their quality of life (QoL) and work-related well-being have not been comprehensively examined. Identifying determinants such as job satisfaction, burnout, workload, cultural adaptation, and professional recognition is critical to maintaining a resilient, motivated workforce. Method. This narrative literature review synthesised evidence regarding QoL among physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia. Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2010–2025) identified English-language empirical studies conducted in Saudi Arabia or involving cross-national comparisons. Study selection adhered to a PRISMA-style process with independent validation. Data were systematically extracted on study design, sample characteristics, QoL measures, and key outcomes, and findings were synthesised thematically within national and global contexts. Results. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Saudi physiotherapists reported moderate to high occupational stress, primarily due to heavy workloads, ambiguous career progression, and inconsistent organisational support. Expatriate physiotherapists, who represent a significant portion of the workforce, encountered additional challenges related to cultural adjustment, communication, and inconsistent orientation practices. International comparisons revealed similar QoL concerns globally, although healthcare reforms under Vision 2030 present unique contextual influences in Saudi Arabia. Significant gaps persist in national data regarding burnout prevalence, mental well-being, and work-life balance. Conclusion. The QoL of physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia is influenced by the interplay of workload, organisational, and cultural factors. Strengthening professional support, career development opportunities, and workforce policies may enhance well-being and retention. Further large-scale, methodologically robust studies are necessary to inform evidence-based workforce planning and policy.